Perhaps the NAPBS can't hold the states to task
What seems as a paradox is the NAPBS Guideline for (record) Providers.
While the NAPBS makes it clear what it wants and how it wants (records checked) from the 'mom and pop' record courthouse retrievers, it is eerily silent about the direct application (or lack of) of those guidelines to standards some states offer.
Not surprising, really.
You try telling New York you will only pay them for their search results if they include alaises, close matches, etc..
Of course, don't forget insisting they provide you with a copy of their E&O insurance, too!
What seems as a paradox is the NAPBS Guideline for (record) Providers.
While the NAPBS makes it clear what it wants and how it wants (records checked) from the 'mom and pop' record courthouse retrievers, it is eerily silent about the direct application (or lack of) of those guidelines to standards some states offer.
Not surprising, really.
You try telling New York you will only pay them for their search results if they include alaises, close matches, etc..
Of course, don't forget insisting they provide you with a copy of their E&O insurance, too!
No comments:
Post a Comment