Can this be a recurring nightmare and pre-employment screening companies are at it again, up to old tricks?
What's this, you ask?
How about stifing vendors?
Thats' right, not paying them.
And then switching to another researcher thereby never talking to the owed and facing up to bill.
Not happening in our industry?
Talk to PRRN members - a recent string of texting confirms this nasty practice has reared its ugly head again.
Of course there are plenty of background check companies that perfectly ethical in ther treatment of vendors, absolutely the majority.
Can we do anything about it? Probably not.
I really would have thought these (bloodsuckers) would have disappeared by now.
Stiffing must be profitable in the pre-employment screening business.
What's this, you ask?
How about stifing vendors?
Thats' right, not paying them.
And then switching to another researcher thereby never talking to the owed and facing up to bill.
Not happening in our industry?
Talk to PRRN members - a recent string of texting confirms this nasty practice has reared its ugly head again.
Of course there are plenty of background check companies that perfectly ethical in ther treatment of vendors, absolutely the majority.
Can we do anything about it? Probably not.
I really would have thought these (bloodsuckers) would have disappeared by now.
Stiffing must be profitable in the pre-employment screening business.
No comments:
Post a Comment