I'm still hemming and hawing about my recent experience with the NAPBS guidleline exam for USA domestic court record retrievers.
Not about the exam, itself.
Now it's comparing the USA domestic guidelines with the 'proposed' international guidelines.
The international guidelines proposed by NAPBS are ambiguous at best and leave pre-employment screening comapnies at a loss.
NAPBS is on the right track asking for feed-back from members about the international 'guidelines.'
How I was included in the discussion of the guidelines or asked to contribute my thoughts about the proposal - I am not sure I was on 'their' list at all - I still do not know.
I think there are many ways to do a criminal search. International AND domestic.
NAPBS needs to be careful.
The guidelines they put forth today might lead to employers doing their own 'nationwide' FBI searches tomorrow.
Where will that leave us?
Not about the exam, itself.
Now it's comparing the USA domestic guidelines with the 'proposed' international guidelines.
The international guidelines proposed by NAPBS are ambiguous at best and leave pre-employment screening comapnies at a loss.
NAPBS is on the right track asking for feed-back from members about the international 'guidelines.'
How I was included in the discussion of the guidelines or asked to contribute my thoughts about the proposal - I am not sure I was on 'their' list at all - I still do not know.
I think there are many ways to do a criminal search. International AND domestic.
NAPBS needs to be careful.
The guidelines they put forth today might lead to employers doing their own 'nationwide' FBI searches tomorrow.
Where will that leave us?
No comments:
Post a Comment