I have written before how international criminal record retrievers engage in passing along information that is incorrect or is totally meanlingless, though it sounds official.
The latest is a thread going through a pre-employment screening Chat List whose topic this time is electronic signatures.
It ( the topic of electronic signatures) was going along smoothly until an international record retriever decided to add this double sided comment:
"All, I can tell you on an international basis that e-signatures are not accepted.
Only wet signatures are allowed, generally."
Here we go again.
The international expert writes first you can't (that is..he goes, "I am an expert and I'm telling you that internationally, E-signatures are not accepted."
But hold on there! His next sentence, "Only wet signatures are allowed, generally."
That throws me for a loop,
What's the "generally" for?
Probably means that All I Can Tell You Is I'm Not Positive About My First Statement About E-signatures not being accepted.
Probably means this, too, "I just want to sound important and knowlegeable and you know, like an expert, so you will give me lots of business."
That is, (Generally Speaking).